• Home
  • About
  • Archives - Wading Through
  • Archives - The Craft Sea

Wading Through...

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives - Wading Through
  • Archives - The Craft Sea

More Nerdy Nonfiction Mini Reviews

 I don't really have a lot to say about these two books, so I thought I would just do a mini review post.

universal (1920).jpeg

Title: Universal Rights Down to Earth

Author: Richard Thompson Ford

Publisher: Norton and Company 2012

Genre: Nonfiction -- Government

Pages: 160

Rating: 3/5 stars

Reading Challenges: Nerdy Nonfiction - Government; Fall into Reading

In Universal Rights Down to Earth, acclaimed author and legal expert Richard Thompson Ford reveals how attempts to apply “universal” human rights principles to specific cultures can hinder humanitarian causes and sometimes even worsen conditions for citizens. In certain regions, human rights ideals clash with the limits of institutional capabilities or civic culture; elsewhere, rights enforcement leads to further human rights violations. And in some countries, offending regimes use human rights commitments to distract attention from or justify their other abuses. Ford explores how our haste to identify every ideal as a universal right devalues rights as a whole, so that even the most important protections—such as that against torture—become negotiable.

Interesting topic, but it felt a bit dense in parts.  More lecture than an enjoying read.  Only for fans of political theory.

final (1920).jpeg

Title: Final Jeopardy

Author: Stephen Baker

Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2011

Genre: Nonfiction - Technologhy

Pages: 288

Rating: 4/5 stars

Reading Challenges: Nerdy Nonfiction - Technology; Fall into Reading

Final Jeopardy traces the arc of Watson’s “life,” from its birth in the IBM labs to its big night on the podium. We meet Hollywood moguls and Jeopardy! masters, genius computer programmers and ambitious scientists, including Watson’s eccentric creator, David Ferrucci. We gain access to Ferrucci’s War Room, where the IBM team works tirelessly to boost Watson’s speed to the buzzer, improve its performance in “train wreck” categories (such as “Books in Español”), and fix glitches like the speech defect Watson developed during its testing phase, when it started adding a d to words ending in n (“What is Pakistand?”).

Really enjoyed reading about the story of Watson.  It didn't delve too much into the software, but maybe that's a good thing for non-tech nerds like me.  Fascinating story...

tags: 3 stars, 4 stars, fall into reading, government, Nerdy Nonfiction, politics, technology
categories: Book Reviews
Friday 12.13.13
Posted by Tobe Buffenbarger
 

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein

Title: The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Author: Robert Heinlein

Publisher: 1966

Genre: Scifi

Pages: 518 (ebook version)

Rating:  4/5 stars

Reading Challenges: Genre - Scifi; Monthly Key Word - February; Ebook; Bingo -- 4 from TBR

How I Got It: We own it

It is a tale of revolution, of the rebellion of the former Lunar penal colony against the Lunar Authority that controls it from Earth. It is the tale of the disparate people--a computer technician, a vigorous young female agitator, and an elderly academic--who become the rebel movement's leaders. And it is the story of Mike, the supercomputer whose sentience is known only to this inner circle, and who for reasons of his own is committed to the revolution's ultimate success.

My third Heinlein book and I dare say the easiest book, at least on the surface.  We have a story of revolution on the moon.  Easy right?  Sure, the first part is easy.  But then we get into more discussions of politics and governmental theory.  What constitutes a good government?  How should we rule?  From there things go from bad to worse.  Revolution is hard, ruling is even harder.  I liked the political discussions above all else.  The storyline and characters are good, but Heinlein excels when characters discuss political philosophy.  Those conversations are what kept me engaged in the book.

As to the style, it took me awhile to get used to the gramatical structure.  There is a mix of English and Russian and an omission of "the" throughout most of the book.  This points to an evolution of language on Luna separate from Terra.  I like the style, but sometimes found myself wanting to "correct" the language.

Just remember: TANSTAAFL!

tags: 5 stars, politics, Robert Heinlein, science fiction, Wicked Valentine's
categories: Book Reviews
Thursday 02.07.13
Posted by Tobe Buffenbarger
 

Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson

Title: Snow Crash

Author: Neal Stephenson

Publisher: Bantam 1992

Genre: Science Fiction (Cyberpunk)

Pages: 440

Rating:   5 / 5 stars

Reading Challenges: Science Fiction; Mount TBR; Fall into Reading

How I Got It: J owns it!

One of Timemagazine's 100 all-time best English-language novels.Only once in a great while does a writer come along who defies comparison—a writer so original he redefines the way we look at the world. Neal Stephenson is such a writer and Snow Crash is such a novel, weaving virtual reality, Sumerian myth, and just about everything in between with a cool, hip cybersensibility to bring us the gigathriller of the information age. In reality, Hiro Protagonist delivers pizza for Uncle Enzo’s CosoNostra Pizza Inc., but in the Metaverse he’s a warrior prince. Plunging headlong into the enigma of a new computer virus that’s striking down hackers everywhere, he races along the neon-lit streets on a search-and-destroy mission for the shadowy virtual villain threatening to bring about infocalypse. Snow Crash is a mind-altering romp through a future America so bizarre, so outrageous…you’ll recognize it immediately.

This is one of those books that took me awhile to get into.  The universe building is a bit extensive.  I was confused about how all the pieces of the puzzles and all the characters would eventually come together.  But I shouldn't have worried.  I was satisfied.  What really got me latched me onto the book was the connections between religion, culture, and technology.  The way the author talks of technology, it is a complete society.  It has a language, it has creation stories and myths, it has characters, it has an evolution.  I loved the scenes between Hiro and the Librarian when they were discussing Sumeria and viruses and the connections to Snow Crash.  Sounds confusing until you read the book and then make all the connections. I went into the book turned off by cyber punk fiction, but I found this great symmetry between it and history and anthropology.  This review has turned into babbling (ha ha Babel!), but I truly did enjoy the novel.  For a better explanation, check out the Wikipedia page.

P.S. A movie version is supposedly in the works, directed by the same director as Attack the Block!

tags: 5 stars, anthropology, linguistics, Neal Stephenson, politics, science fiction
categories: Book Reviews
Tuesday 10.30.12
Posted by Tobe Buffenbarger
Comments: 2
 

Liberty Defined by Ron Paul

Title: Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues that Affect Our Freedom

Author: Ron Paul

Publisher: Foundation for Rational Economics and Education 2011

Genre: Nonfiction - Politics

Pages: 328

Rating:  3/5 stars

Reading Challenges: Dewey -- 320s

How I Got It: Library Loan

In Liberty Defined, congressman and #1 New York Times bestselling author Ron Paul returns with his most provocative, comprehensive, and compelling arguments for personal freedom to date.

This is a comprehensive guide to Dr. Paul's position on fifty of the most important issues of our times, from Abortion to Zionism. Accessible, easy to digest, and fearless in its discussion of controversial topics, LIBERTY DEFINED sheds new light on a word that is losing its shape.

I picked this up on a whim.  Throughout the primaries, I was intrigued by Paul's statements and seemingly exclusion treatment from the Republican Party.  So what's wrong with this guy?  According to my reading of his book, plenty.  Now let me go back.  For the most part of this book, I was with him.  And then in each chapter, he seemingly goes of the deep end.  I just couldn't follow through on most of his arguments.  I keep hearing myself going "yes, I completely understand" until I got to the ending paragraphs of each chapter.  Then my statements changed to "what the hell?  why did you just go there?"  Often his rational arguments start just fine and then he jumps tracks to a totally different argument to end.  My main problem is that most of his ideas are interesting but they could not be put in place given our current reality.  We need to start with our current reality and start making laws to achieve an ultimate end.  Bottom line: I will not be voting for Ron Paul in any election.

tags: 3 stars, nonfiction, politics, Ron Paul
categories: Book Reviews
Monday 09.03.12
Posted by Tobe Buffenbarger
Comments: 1
 

I am a citizen.

I don't think I've ever discussed my personal politics on this blog.  I have them, but either I am surrounded by people who share my beliefs or I'm in asituation where politics is just not appropriate.  I'm not one of those people who constantly lets everyone know where I stand on issues.  But sometimes they come out.  And when they do it's usually because I feel very strongly about an issue.  So, let me tell you a little bit about me...

1. I am political.  I think on some level we all are.  It's just that some people don't feel comfortable discussing their thoughts.  Or maybe it's because they don't know how.  Being political and staying active in the running of this country is the only way to secure democracy and freedom for ages to come.

2.  I am an American. I believe in the power of our government to grow and evolve.  To create a better place for our children and our children's children.  I wouldn't want to live anywhere else in the world (visit, sure, but not live).

3. I am a patriot.  I support America as a country.  However, I also recognize when we are wrong.  I don't naively think that America is the only important nation in the world.  I also do not think everyone else is out to get us.  That type of thinking leads to wars and lost lives.  I believe in patriotism, not nationalism.  Look up the difference.

4. I am a supporter of the President. Whoever he or she may be.  I may disagree with the current President's policies, but I will support the office of the Presidency.  If you don't like the current administration, get out and vote.  Get involved in campaigns.  Raise or give money for various campaigns.  Or run for office yourself.  Once a person is elected, it is our duty to work with that person to create a better America.

5. I am a believer in federalism.  Let's not forget that our government has three branches at the federal level (judicial, legislative, and executive), but also has levels of federalism (national, state, and local).  Each section of our government has different duties laid out in the Constitution, state constitutions, and local charters.  Crossing those lines destroys the fundamental layout of our government.  Some issues, such as education, should be left to state and local levels.  Others, such as treaties and wars, should be left to the national level.  I am disheartened by the mixing of duties and expansions of power at every level.  Let's get back to the basic structures outlined in the Constitution.

6. I am a believer in an ever evolving Constitution.  I do not believe that the Founding Fathers expected us to read the Constitution literally, word for word.  It was meant to be a dynamic document.  They wisely included a way to change the Constitution: amendments.  Of course, they made it difficult to get an amendment approved.  The time and effort required allows the population to determine all sides of the issue presented and decided yes or no.

7. In general, I am somewhere on the political spectrum. Everyone falls somewhere.  We all have differing views on issues and components of the government.  And yet, I don't always feel comfortable identifying as liberal or conservative, democrat or republican, left or right.  We've gotten so mixed up when it comes to those terms.  Each one carries a weight that I don't feel represents me.

8. Therefore, I am a multi issue voter.  I refuse to vote party ticket in any election.  I want to examine the current issues.  I want to examine the current candidates. Then I will make my decision.  Please don't pigeon hole me as a one issue voter or a category (women, young voter, middle class, etc).

These being said, there are a few general issues that I will always stand up for.

9. I am a believer in civil equality.  Every citizen deserves equal treatment under the law.  Segregating the population by any means is detrimental to civil equality.  That being said, I believe in same sex couples being able to marry.  I believe in all people having the opportunity for a free and equal education.  I believe in addressing the citizenship issues of illegal aliens and their children.  We are of one race, humanity, let's start acting like it.

10. I am for privacy rights.  While I enjoy many of the programs created by the government (police departments, libraries, international trade agreements, legal system), we should still value our privacy and individuality.  The biggest issue right now is in regards to contraceptives and abortion.  Not matter where your morality stands, these are privacy issues.  When we cross the line of telling any women what she can and cannot do with her body, we are creating a police state a la 1984.  I don't want to live in that world.  And I bet you don't either.  The slippery slope toward an autocratic society is privacy issues.

11. I am not a supporter of legislating a religious morality.  I am all for people making personal decisions when it comes to their personal lives.  Feel free to live your religion or morality.  The Constitution gives you that right.  But the other part of that amendment allows for freedom against religion, government mandated religion.  All of these current candidates spouting promises to follow Biblical law in their hoped for offices scare me.  I don't want Biblical law governing me.  I want a consensus of laws decided on by the populace.  We are not all Christian.  We are not all agnostics.  We are not all Muslim.  We all not Hindu.  Etc.  We are a collection of peoples, beliefs, and lifestyles.  And yet, we can agree on basic laws to protect the population.  Just don't use the Old Testament as your campaign promise.  Have your read some of those Biblical laws?  I didn't realize that we could pick and choose which ones to follow.  I assumed that the Bible was supposed to be taken word for word.  According to the candidates, homosexuality should be made illegal, but adultery is okay...  Right....

After getting all doom and gloom there, I want to end with two affirmations.

12. I am a human being.  I like to be treated nicely.  I will treat you nicely.  No one deserves second class treatment.  I am of the traditional ruling class of middle class European descendent.  And yet, I experienced a lack of courtesy in many situations.  I am a woman.  I am (was) a single mom.  I am (was) poor.  I was a left-leaning person in a very right-leaning town.  Every time I was put down or placed in a lower position, it hurt.  I want to find commonalities between us, not differences.  Let's work together.

13.  I am hopeful for the future.  As cynical or pessimistic as I may be in my daily life, my future outlook is always hopeful.  I want the best.  I want to improve.  I want to leave this world a little bit brighter for my descendants.  Look to the future.  Deal with issues in the present, but always with an eye to the future.  Somehow politics has changed the orientation to reminiscing about the past.  That's no way to create a better world.  Hope for the future.

tags: politics
categories: Life
Friday 05.11.12
Posted by Tobe Buffenbarger
 

Powered by Squarespace.